Led astray by Marxist and Keynesian dogma, the literature on the origins of the permanent war economy has overlooked a leading cause of the elevated levels of U.S. military spending since the end of World War II: the economic rents created by the federal government’s monopoly on national defense, and the pursuit of those rents by the labor, industry, and military lobbies. Although the permanent war economy benefits powerful special interest groups, it generates a significant negative externality by diverting resources from other, private uses.

Christopher J. Coyne is a Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute, Professor of Economics at George Mason University, and Co-Editor of The Independent Review.
Twitter      Email
Thomas K. Duncan is Mercatus Dissertation Fellow at the Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
American HistoryAntitrust, Competition, and MonopolyDefense and Foreign PolicyEconomic PolicyEconomyLabor and EmploymentLaw and LibertyRegulationTerrorism and Homeland Security
Other Independent Review articles by Christopher J. Coyne
Spring 2025 The Nuclear Ratchet: Crisis, Leviathan, and Atomic Weapons
Spring 2025 What’s the Worst That Could Happen?: Existential Risk and Extreme Politics
Spring 2024 Murray Rothbard on War and Foreign Policy
[View All (48)]
Other Independent Review articles by Thomas K. Duncan
Fall 2014 Torpedo: Inventing the Military-Industrial Complex in the United States and Great Britain