• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics

Main Content

Featured Story

“But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”

21 Sep 2025 By Gavin 152 Comments

Almost two decades ago, some scientists predicted that Arctic summer sea ice would 'soon' disappear. These predictions were mentioned by Al Gore and got a lot of press. However, they did not gain wide acceptance in the scientific community, and were swiftly disproven. Unsurprisingly, this still comes up a lot. Time for a deeper dive into what happened and why... … Read Full Article about “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”

Featured Story

Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman

18 Sep 2025 By Gavin 59 Comments

Here we go again. An obscure, methodologically poor, paper published with little to no review makes a convenient point and gets elevated into supposedly 'blockbusting' science by the merchants of bullshit, sorry, doubt. Actual scientists drop everything to respond, but not before the (convenient) nonsense has spread widely. Rebuttals are written and submitted, but by the time they are published … Read Full Article about Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman

Recent Posts

Unforced variations: Oct 2025

1 Oct 2025 By group 45 Comments

This month's open thread. Lots of salient stuff this month so please try and stay focused and constructive! … Read Full Article about Unforced variations: Oct 2025

Lil’ NAS Express

17 Sep 2025 By group 47 Comments

The fast-tracked update of the 2009 EPA Endangerment finding from the National Academies for Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM), has now been released. … Read Full Article about Lil’ NAS Express

DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

10 Sep 2025 By Gavin 119 Comments

Somewhat breaking news. A court filing (from 9/4) from DOE has noted that the Climate Working Group has been disbanded (as of 9/3). This was done to make the EDF/UCS lawsuit moot, but it also means that DOE is withdrawing the report, no-one will respond appropriately to the comments submitted, and … Read Full Article about DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

Climate Scientists response to DOE report

2 Sep 2025 By Gavin 71 Comments

As we've mentioned, Andrew Dessler and Robert Kopp have been coordinating a scientific peer review of the DOW 'CWG' Critique of Climate Science. It is now out. … Read Full Article about Climate Scientists response to DOE report

Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review

2 Sep 2025 By group 60 Comments

Guest commentary by Kerry Emanuel Executive Summary Chapter 6 of the draft DOE report examines whether global warming exacerbates extreme weather. It rightly notes that because events such as hurricanes are rare, detecting their response to climate change in short and imperfect historical … Read Full Article about Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review

Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

1 Sep 2025 By group

This month's open thread. As usual try to remain substantive and avoid insults and personal attacks on other commenters. Any sock-puppetry or abusive comments will just be deleted on sight. Also, please don't outsource your comments to ChatGPT - cut-and-pastes of long-winded LLM output are tedious … Read Full Article about Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

14 Aug 2025 By group 285 Comments

The first somewhat comprehensive reviews of the DOE critical review are now coming online. … Read Full Article about Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

1 Aug 2025 By group

This month's open thread. Please try and stay focused on substance rather than personalities. There are many real issues that are particularly salient this month, and so maybe we can collectively try not to have the comments descend into tedium. Note: Moderation will be applied to over-frequent … Read Full Article about Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?

31 Jul 2025 By group

In the EPA EF reconsideration document there is a section on p62 where they attempt to make the argument that the CO2 endangerment finding would also apply to direct water vapor emissions to the atmosphere, which is (according to them) obviously absurd. But both claims are bogus. … Read Full Article about Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?

The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?

29 Jul 2025 By group

The EPA, along with the "Climate Working Group" (CWG) of usual suspects (plus Judith Curry and Ross McKitrick) at DOE, have just put out a document for public comment their attempt to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding for greenhouse gas emissions. … Read Full Article about The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?

<< All Posts

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Julian on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • b fagan on Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman
  • Susan Anderson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Susan Anderson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Matthew MARLER on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mal Adapted on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mal Adapted on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Pete best on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mo Yunus on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Geoff Miell on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Piotr on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • nigelj on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Pete Best on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • MA Rodger on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • Pete Best on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,383 posts

11 pages

247,273 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.