The Cost of the $199 iPhone: $10 More a Month for Data

The biggest news from Apple is what Steve Jobs didn’t say: It has completely changed the basis of its deals with AT&T and other wireless carriers.

According to a news release from AT&T, the carrier will no longer give a portion of monthly usage fees to Apple. Instead carriers will pay Apple a subsidy for each phone sold, in order to bring the price from $399 down to $199 for the 8 Gigabyte model. The company did not specify the amount of the subsidy. Subsidies of $200 to $300 are common in the industry.

What is more, consumers will now pay $30 a month for unlimited data service from AT&T, compared with $20 under the plan introduced last year. So even though the phone will now cost $200, consumers will be out more cash at the end of a two-year contract compared with the previous deal.

Of course, that includes faster 3G data service, so the price increase may be worth it. But we should call it an iPhone price increase, not a cut.

Unlimited data service for business users will cost $45 a month.

AT&T says the shift to upfront subsidies will cut into profits to the tune of 10 cents to 12 cents a share, both this year and next. As the number of customers paying the higher monthly bills increases, the phone company says profit per share will start to increase in 2010.

AT&T also said in its release that it now has 3G data service in 280 metropolitan areas, and that will increase to 350 areas by the end of the year.

For Apple, this move to getting all its money up front has several advantages. By using the same economic model as every other cell phone maker, it makes it easier to bring the phone to carriers in every corner of the world.

It also should help insulate Apple from the cost of people who buy iPhones and unlock them to use on carriers that don’t pay Apple the monthly fee. Now Apple will get its money, say $500, up front and it no longer has to police what people do with them. Whether Apple will still keep penalizing users who unlock their phones is one of the many questions that remain to be answered.

Indeed, Apple has just filed a short disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission saying that outside of the United States and a few other countries, its deals with carriers are not exclusive.

Apple has signed multi-year agreements with carriers authorizing them to distribute and provide network services for iPhones in over 70 countries. These agreements are generally not exclusive with a specific carrier, except in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Ireland, and certain other countries. Under the vast majority of these agreements, Apple will not receive follow-on revenue generating payments from carriers for the new iPhone 3G beyond the purchase of the device by carriers or a commission on sales of the device by Apple. Apple will continue to receive payments from cellular network providers related to first-generation iPhones as long as they remain active on authorized networks.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Ok love the cheaper iPhone but I have no interest in adding 30 dollars a month to my cell phone bill. Even if I did that 30 dollars goes into my gas tank these days.

Too bad so sad still not buying one.

Yah, but at the end of the day, you’re paying a total of $40 more per year for considerably faster networking. That seems like a small price to pay for such an increased service…

“Whether Apple will still keep penalizing users who unlock their phones is one of the many questions that remain to be answered.”

When has Apple penalized unlockers? Oh, because at one time hacked, unlocked phones bricked because Apple updated software and doesn’t support hacked, unlocked phones? And what do you mean “still”?

Apple already gets the money upfront — they just spread the revenue over 24 months. It’s just a accounting thing.

It is always something.

This is absolutely absurd! In order to upgrade to the new iPhone 3G I have to first PAY for it – whereupon I am FORCED to sign a new two year contract that will FORCE me to give AT&T an extra $240 over the life of it. Even adding that $240 to the $299 sticker price and realizing it’s cheaper than a $599 upfront cost, I’d still rather pay upfront than have ATT force me into a contract that is higher than my original terms! I wish they’d honor the original contract and just upgrade my hardware – but I guess this is America and the greedy capitalists always win.

I applaud the release of an enhanced iPhone. Many of the new features will indeed make the phone a more useful and practical device. However, I am disappointed not to hear of refinements, such as copy and paste, better web browser caching, and more.

The $200 price tag is also quite inviting. I can just imagine the lines at the Apple store on release day! I am not so concerned about the additional data transfer cost, as with 3G, we should, in theory, get more for our money.

Uhm, if I buy an iPhone 3g from Apple’s website for $199, and then activate it on Tmobile, I don’t think AT&T is going to pay Apple $200. In other words, I am sure Apple is going to get it’s subsidization money from AT&T when the subscriber signs a 2 year contract, and not a second before.

Dexter, where are you getting the $40/yr figure from? It’s an extra $10/mo from what it currently costs, so it’s an extra $120/yr, or $240 over the course of the 2-year contract. That actually puts the cost of the new phone at $420, an INCREASE of $20!

So now that 3G is the only option, and you have to pay the higher pricing for it, what about all of us who live in areas that AT&T won’t be upgrading to 3G until ????

Maybe I am missing something with everyone getting irate at $30 per month for the data and have to sign up for two years. I have to sign up for two years with Verizon and pay those guys $45 per month for the priviledge of EVDO.

And although I love my Q with the email connection and Web browsing, the IPhone interface is way cooler! And there is no such thing as using my phone on another network so the term “unlock” is meaningless to me.

Omega,

There are 2 possibilities:
1. The activation scheme will change and you won’t be able to buy an iPhone without activating on the spot and signing a 2 year contract [admittedly unlikely]

OR

2. As you suggest, Apple will get its subsidy when the subscriber signs a 2 year contract. But if that is the case, you can bet that it is going to be VERY difficult to activate and unlock a 3G iPhone by any other than official means.

Angry Mark,
Lest you forget, an iPhone is not a necessity and if you think Apple and AT&T are giving you a bad deal, you have plenty of alternatives that you’re perfectly entitled to. Take out your sense of indignation on the last boss you ever asked for a pay cut.

Keeping my Blackberry….

But will they also provide more messaging included with the extra $10 for the 3G plan? The current EDGE 1st gen plan only includes 200 texts with that $20 data plan. Throwing in a few extra texts standard (say 500 to start, $5 extra for 1,500) would soften the blow a little.

Anonymous Coward June 9, 2008 · 5:43 pm

With the way inflation has been happening, it’s probably still cheaper by the time 2010 rolls around. . .

Omega, new 3G iphones won’t be available at the online store. Only at the physical ATT and Apple stores in the US, where I reckon the new sales model will be: You get to buy one as you sign up for a 24 month plan from ATT. It wipes out the unlocker market. This is the way other subsidized cells are sold and the way Apple will from today.

The bottom line – after 2 years, you’ve paid a net $40 (440 – 400) more for 3G and GPS capabilities, not to mention improved battery life. Sounds like a fantastic deal to me. Personally, I’ve been holding out for this iteration of the iPhone. 3G, GPS and semi-open development platform. It will be fun to watch the developers give the iPhone a whirl given the faster speeds and tidy navigation/location tools.

OMG! Got to get one!

You say that this arrangement will “insulate Apple from the cost of people who buy iPhones and unlock them to use on carriers that don’t pay Apple the monthly fee.”

Probably not. Unless ATT is really stupid, they will only pay Apple for iPhones that are actually activated with an ATT 2-year phone plan. On the other hand, the iPhone is now available in so many locations on so many carriers, the number of phones that are unlocked and moved to other networks will probably begin to drop.

Am I the only one who remembers when 3G data used to cost $60 a month? $30 is a bargain, believe me.

Did people really expect to get the speed increase of 3G for free? Why would the iPhone be any different from any other 3G device? 3G Blackberries and Windows mobile phones have more expensive data plans, too.

I’d love to have an iPhone and I’d pay a lot more for one, but I’m not getting a cell contract with AT&T or any other company.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Mark!

Where do you live that they force you to buy an iphone? I don’t get it when people are outraged at the price of something that is not a necessity. DONT BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sheesh

Camilo

this is so aggravating i cant stand it i thought the 2.0 software release was in mid june .. now there releasing a better iphone along with the 2.0 update early july. i don’t mind the 10$ dollar a month price increase because its not 120 dollars more all at once its over a full year compared to the actual price of the phone. come on people 20 dollars over 2 years for an update.. its not that bad

Will the higher monthly data fee include push email? That’s really what I’m looking for the most, so I can get rid of the Blackberry that I’m still using.