Effect of whitening dentifrices on the superficial roughness of esthetic restorative materials

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(2):102-8; discussion 109. doi: 10.2310/6130.2006.00017_1.x.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness (Ra) of different esthetic restorative materials following simulated toothbrushing using different whitening dentifrices.

Materials and methods: Cylinders of Esthet-X (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA), Durafil VS (Heraeus Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany), and Vitremer (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were made using molds (4 mm in diameter for 2 mm in height). The superficial roughness was evaluated using a profilometer (Ra) with a cutoff length of 0.25 mm and a speed of 0.1 mm/s. The specimens (N=13) were submitted to 7,500 brushing cycles using five different toothpastes: (1) Crest Regular (control; Procter & Gamble): silica abrasive (C); (2) Crest Extra Whitening (Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA): bicarbonate+calcium pyrophosphate (CE); (3) Dental Care A & H (Arm & Hammer, Camilla, GA, USA): bicarbonate (DC); (4) Rembrandt Plus Whitening (Oral B Laboratories, Belmont, CA, USA): carbamide peroxide+alumina/silica (RP); and (5) experimental: hydrogen peroxide+calcium carbonate (EX).

Results: The data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (alpha=.05) for each restorative material, and the results [difference between final and initial roughness: Ra(F)-Ra(I) in microm] were as follows: Esthet-X: EX=0.15+0.07a; RP=0.29+0.16a; CE=0.96+0.33b; C=1.03+0.29b; DC=1.48+0.37b; Durafil VS: RP=0.09+0.07a; EX=0.55+0.23abc; C=0.96+0.26bc; CE=1.03+0.33cd; DC=1.09+0.37d; and Vitremer: EX=0.10+0.08a; RP=0.26+0.19a; CE=0.94+0.27b; DC=1.13+0.46bc; C=1.50+0.32c (different letters mean differences among groups).

Conclusion: It was verified that the dentifrices containing carbamide or hydrogen peroxide along with alumina+silica and calcium carbonate, respectively (groups 4 and 5), produced minor changes in Ra when compared with the control group and with those dentifrices containing bicarbonate (groups 2 and 3). CLINICAL significance The results of this study indicate that whitening dentifrices evaluated containing silica or calcium carbonate were less abrasive when used on the resin-based esthetic restorative materials than those that contain sodium bicarbonate.

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Oxide
  • Calcium Carbonate
  • Carbamide Peroxide
  • Composite Resins*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Dentifrices*
  • Drug Combinations
  • Glass Ionomer Cements*
  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Materials Testing
  • Oxidants
  • Peroxides
  • Silicon Dioxide
  • Sodium Bicarbonate
  • Surface Properties
  • Tooth Bleaching / methods*
  • Toothbrushing
  • Urea / analogs & derivatives

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Dentifrices
  • Drug Combinations
  • Esthet-X
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Oxidants
  • Peroxides
  • Vitremer
  • Carbamide Peroxide
  • Silicon Dioxide
  • Durafill
  • Sodium Bicarbonate
  • Urea
  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Calcium Carbonate
  • Aluminum Oxide